Category: Let's talk
Usually if people say something which isn't true about another person they don't like it. Well Innesle said I had something against her and it gave me a great idea. Call it inspiration if you like. For the record I don't have anything against Innesle. Here are the names of people I do have something against, anyone want to know why for a specific person ask, and you may also respond by doing the same as me because most people dislike/hate someone. Mathew Ward-Birmingham, Becky Brooks-Devon Dean Mills-Stockport, Leanne Snowdin-Featherstone Adam Gray-Lincolnshire. all locations above in England and below in Wales. Hellen Evans-Borf, John-Joe-Wrexham. There are a lot more people I hate, but now here are the reasons why some people may be disliked by me. They behave in a weird way by making stupid noises in public, unnecessarily drawing attention to themselves, been jesus freaks, do gooders, been passionate about their disability if they have one all those listed do because most sighted people I've met are too great to hate, and people who don't shower and shave when they're supposed to so they appear disgusting.
lol! I don't even know any of these people. I don't think it's really fair to judge someone over quicknotes though and try hard not to do it myself. But sometimes, you just can't help it. heheheh Just for the record, I have no one with whom I have something against on the zone. They haven't done anything major to me to care about! hehehehe
*sexy*
Just block the idiots. Don't waste your time.
hmmmm, as for zoners, the count of monte -christo because he's a two faced liar richy and cubs fan for sending me perverted qn's and any and all of my stalkers...you know who you are. as for the people i know...ross de vent for stepping off a train in between stops when his guide dog refused to get off the train. it's his own silly fault for not trusting the dog. he's an ausie btw from melbourne. hell, i really could have written this better.,
I have to agree with Lui. Yes. The Count of MOnte-Christo is on my "better ignore him"-list actually. Now. Not earlier. And people who are rude to others. I want ot mention The Game now. I am sure you can be nice but ... if people annoy you, then god damn, ignore them.
now Loui, why would you say that about ross? that is stupid and immature!
gbecause anyone who does not trust the guide dog they have to guide them around really shouldn't have gotten the guide dog in the first place. and,rachel, might i remind you that others have to suffer now because of his mistake.
all blind people travelling on country victorian trains must be assisted on and off the train. this is because of his mistake.
Loui, first thing is first, you should not have mentioned his full name on a public site where he is not a member of. that should just fall under the form of common sense. How would you like it if I, unbeknowns to you, were to put a page up on my site (which you didn't even know existed) mentioning your full name for the world to see. "and by the way people, you don't know this person but I do and trust me, she is horrible". that's the kind of thing you did here.
And secondly you have not got a guide dog, so you shouldn't just presume things. When I first got my guide dog, it took a few years for me to learn to trust her and that's what it's like with every average team. He only had his guide dog for a few months, maybe about six months.
Thirdly you don't know that it's the only reason now why we all need assistence with getting on and off trains. And so what if it is? It is far more productive to try and advocate to the appropriate rail people that not all of us require assistence and state your reason in a rational manner, instead of coming on here and bashing someone who no-body on here knows as he probably doesn't even know about this site himself.
And finally I have nothing against you no. in fact there's been a number of times I have attempted to talk to you but you've ignored me. I am just now responding to a post that was made which I feel was totally uncalled for writing here.
ok, firstly I would like to say that I don't believe this topic should have even been created to begin with. I've always been of the belief that if you can't say anything nice about anyone, then don't say anything. I know this is often hard to achieve, and we're all guilty of bitching about people we don't like. However I feel that it is very inappropriate to do it in this manner--if you have issues with someone, try and work it out between you, rather than going and bitching to the world about them. Secondly, Louie, I travelled on a country train with my guide dog last week and didn't require assistance getting on and off, only to be taken to a taxi when I arrived at spencer street. And to the game, I know it's hard to deal with people who have blindisms, but it often can't be helped. With some it can, I agree, but for those who have autism or some other disability it is more difficult to teach them to break habbits.
Waw. Finally someone says something inteligent. I absolutely agree with Lolin. This topic shouldn't have been created at all. I mean if wonderful wangel has something against Inesel, what do I care? And if I have something against certain people, would you guys give a damn? Of course not! C'mon, let's use our time over something more worthwhile. If wonderful wangel has something against Inesel, he should have told her so in a private mail, but why let the entire world know? it's ridiculous. C'mon children, grow up.
Joaquín.
ok, i admit that i shouldn't have mentioned his full name, but for the record, my name can be mentioned on websites and i couldn't care less, because i'm not likely to read them, rachel, i wasn't awhere i had ever ignored you.
I appologise for that, but, i do not appologise for saying that. Lolin, this is now written in the v.line occupational health and safety act or something. And, i don't like anyone's chances of changing it. I couldn't care less, i'm from N.S.W, but, i'd like to see the poor conductor who tries to ebver help me on or off a train in melbourne. never going to happen.
Yeah right I agree with that, Lauren. I just needed to remind people that they should not be so rude to others.
Right as far as this full names goes, I mentioned a lot more full names, and I even gave the locations of these people. Secondly, I would hate someone who's actions made people judge someone who didn't know that person differently, so Galileo is right here too. Thirdly, I can say what I want about who I want whether good or bad, that's the beauty of free speech, and to disagree would mean you were behaving like a terrorist so go marry Bin Laden, oh yeah! It seems that no matter how clear I make it, people still are convinced I have something against Innesle, so believe what you want if you think I do, go on. Some people just like being wrong and if you think I don't, pat on the back, you understand English! oh and don't think that's a dig at people who don't have English as a first language. What the heck am I talking about actually, go on, of course it's a dig at Innesle, and the other people who speak some language other tan English because afterall, people who aren't descendants of English speakers are inferior, see I can havehave any view if it makes youfeel better. Think what you want, reach your own conclusions about which views I have, you're more convinced by each other on my views than you are by the person who created those views in the first place. How strange, still as long as you understand yourselves ay? In fact, in future, you tell me what my views are, since you know what I think better than I do, and I'll just go along. Saves all the hastle of explaining myself time and time again, and also I ca't be held responsible for my views that way, Ha!
OK then. wangel, you don't seem to get my point so I will elaborate and make some observations, provided that you are a civilized person that reads carefully.
1. Mentioning full names: you seem to have no respect for something called privacy of others. To support my point, I will quote you:
You said: "Right as far as this full names goes, I mentioned a lot more full names, and I even gave the locations of these people."
Are you in a position to give the full name of someone just because you can? No you are not. Why? Because although this site has freedom of speech,
your freedom ends when you give information that discloses details that other people do not want the whole world to know. This time you gave the location,
which is not a very grave fault, but what if, for instance, someone gave the phone number and street address of another user? Would you like that? Is that
the beauty of freedom of speech you're proud of? Giving the location and/or full name of people without their consent should not be allowed here, regardless
of the freedom of speech thing. Oftentimes people on here use freedom of speech as a perfect excuse to be rude to others.
You said: "I can say what I want about who I want
whether good or bad, that's the beauty of free speech, and to disagree would mean you were behaving like a terrorist so go marry Bin Laden"
This is one of the most uncalled for comments I've ever heard on the zone. So. Child. Everyone who disagrees with you is a terrorist? That is pure rubbish
and it shows some close-mindedness from you, lad. Where is the freedom of speech you've been preaching about if, basically, everyone disagreeing with you
is wrong? Dude, grow, and learn that people can have different views than your own and there's no need to alude to Bin Laden and terrorism on here, just
because they think differently than you. And if we are to speak about terrorism, let's not forget about the British government and its "we are about to
be attacked" attitude, that does nothing but terrorize its people and make it live in a constant state of fear. Now I saw that myself, so if you're going
to contradict me on that one, do it with valid arguments.
>br<And finally, you said: "people who aren't descendants of English speakers are inferior"
Although you said this in sarcasm, for I know you do have non-English descendent friends so I strongly doubt you think that way, that was a very rude
comment to make. Remember that no racist comments are allowed in the policies of this site, and you're setting yourself up to getting banned. Care to read
the policies, lad.
Joaquín
I dont see a point in this entire topic. I mean some of the replies made good points. but it seems like the original poster is lacking in maturity.
whatever; I still don't believe one has any right to bash someone like this outside the site and for reasons most wouldn't relate too. but whatever! This is the last post from me on this ridiculous topic. I'm more concerned with who stole the cookie from the cookie jar! :)
latino, i think you have missed the point of post 13, What tww is trying to say, or, how i interpret it, is that nobody is paying attention to his actual views, so he may as well say anything at all and let you all make your own conclutions as to whathe actually believes in, because no one is paying attention anyway. This is clearly shown because some people still think he has something against ines.
However, tww, you made your point, but, in a somewhat slightly immature manner, and, i think that's being polite.
Right, well in response to the last 3 posts mainly the long one because there's a lot more to respond to, any assumption that I am a racist is incredibly inaccurate. In fact, all the people who haven't met me at all, don't even know what ethnicity I have anyway, so that would be another assumption like the one aout Innesle, and especially so since one of my best friends is of a different ethnicity to me. As for the Bin Laden remark, that was taken too seriously but the taking of that remark so seriously prooves my point that whatever I say, people will reach there own conclusions about what I think, and their conclusion may be the exact opposite of what I said. The terroist refference was purely tongue in cheek, but I've lost count of the amount of times a remark I've made has been taken tongue in cheek. Finally no matter who is against it and how much people are against it, no matter how much they dislike it, I do have the freedom to name people as I choose, and if I was saying I hated a famous person like say George W. Bush from the White House, then it wouldn't matter that I'd given his surname and address. As for the point of this topic, there wasn't really much of one, it's just something I felt like doing at the time aftr reading that people thought I hated someone who I didn't who herself even realises I don't.
hmmmm, tww, you just reminded me, i forgot to name george w bush as one of the people i have something against...how could i forget him? as for why, well, the war on iraq, his disregard for other countries and their people and his disregard for the poorer citizens of his own country. hmmmm, i could go on, but i'm not going too.
As for me I don't hate anyone! I did however put someone who was rude to me on ignore! I didn't even say one word to this person!
Ye Lui I agree with oyu on that one about Bush, He is someone ... I would never sympathize with.